Liquid Crystal (LC) Dimming Film vs. Photochromic Coating
- Erez Baron
- Jul 17
- 6 min read
Liquid Crystal (LC) Dimming Film vs. Photochromic Coating: Which One Is Better for Adaptive Tinting?
Adaptive tinting offers dynamic control over light transmission, transforming products like eyewear, windows, and visors from passive accessories into smart, responsive systems. Two leading solutions are electric LC films and passive photochromic coatings. Each brings distinct switching behavior, power requirements, and application strengths.
Liquid Crystal (LC) dimming films are active materials that shift between transparent and opaque states when an electrical voltage is applied. This near-instant response, with transition times in millisecond makes them ideal for privacy and dynamic control.

In contrast, photochromic coatings are busy adapting to ultraviolet (UV) exposure. These coatings darken under UV light and slowly revert to clear in its absence. They are energy-free but lack precise control and rapid response, especially when light changes quickly.
Choosing between these technologies depends on factors like speed, convenience, energy use, and functional requirements. Let’s explore how each solution works and where each shines.
Description of LC Film and Photochromic Coating
LC (Liquid Crystal) Film: A polymer-dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) film with dichroic dyes are sandwiched between conductive layers. An electric field aligns the crystals and allows light to pass. When switched off, its transparent and upon electrical field its tinted.
Photochromic Coating: A UV-sensitive material containing molecules (e.g., silver halide in glass or organic photochromic agents in plastics) that reversibly changes structure and absorption on UV exposure.

Core Technology Overview
LC Film: Basic Technology (Guest-Host and Twisted Nematic)
Liquid Crystal (LC) films used for dimming applications are commonly based on either Guest-Host (GH) or Twisted Nematic (TN) technologies. In Guest-Host mode, dichroic dye molecules (“guests”) are mixed into a nematic liquid crystal “host.” When no voltage is applied, the liquid crystal and dye molecules are aligned in a way that allows light to pass through, making the film naturally transparent, this is known as the normally open state.
When voltage is applied, the LC molecules reorient, causing the dye molecules to absorb light, creating a dimming or darkened state. GH technology does not require polarizers, which results in lower haze, high optical clarity, and excellent flexibility, ideal for curved, wearable, or laminated optical applications.
In comparison, Twisted Nematic (TN) LC films utilize a 90° twist of LC molecules in their default (no voltage) state, which rotates polarized light and allows it to pass through a second polarizer, resulting in a transparent appearance. When voltage is applied, the twist is undone, and the light is blocked, producing an complete darkness or dimmed state. TN requires polarizers and generally offers higher contrast, but often with more haze and less flexibility than GH films.
Smart Films International focuses on GH and TN for their fast switching seamless integration into smart eyewear and dimmable optical products.
Photochromic Coating: Basic Technology
Photochromic coatings are light-responsive materials that change their optical properties specifically, their light transmission, when exposed to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. These coatings are widely used in lenses, sunglasses, helmets, and other light-sensitive optics, where they provide passive, automatic tinting without any electronic control.
The core technology relies on photo-sensitive molecules embedded in or coated onto the surface of a transparent substrate (typically polycarbonate, CR-39 plastic, or glass). The most common molecules used are:
Silver halide crystals (used in glass-based photochromic lenses)
Organic compounds such as spiropyrans, naphthopyrans, or oxazines (used in plastic lenses).
When exposed to UV radiation, particularly UVA (320–400 nm) the photochromic molecules undergo a reversible molecular transformation:
Closed-ring → open-ring (in organics), or
Colorless → tinted ionized state (in silver halide)
This structural change alters the molecule's absorption spectrum, causing it to absorb more visible light and darken the lens. When the UV stimulus is removed (e.g., indoors or under shade), the molecules revert to their original form, gradually restoring the lens to a clear or nearly clear state.
Production Methods: GH, TN, and Photochromic Technologies
Production Methods: GH, TN, and Photochromic Technologies
Guest-Host (GH) LC films
Typically fabricated using a closed cell. A mixture of liquid crystal and dichroic dyes is applied between two transparent conductive substrates (often ITO-coated PET). The alignment layer determines the molecular orientation, and the entire structure is laminated under controlled pressure and temperature. GH cells do not require polarizers, simplifying the layer stack and enabling flexible, roll-to-roll production ideal for curved or wearable applications.
Twisted Nematic (TN) LC cells
In contrast, involve a more precise assembly. Two film substrates are coated with transparent electrodes and alignment layers that are rubbed in orthogonal directions to induce the 90° molecular twist. The cell is then filled with nematic liquid crystal in a cleanroom environment and sealed. TN structures require external polarizers on both sides, adding steps to the manufacturing process. The alignment precision and polarizer lamination are critical for achieving optical contrast.
Photochromic coatings
Applied directly to lens surfaces (glass or plastic) through dip-coating, spin-coating, or in-mass impregnation (especially in plastic lenses). The photochromic molecules are either bonded to the surface or diffused into the substrate. After application, the coating undergoes curing (thermal or UV), and often receives scratch-resistant and anti-reflective layers for durability. This process is relatively low-cost and scalable but offers less functional control compared to LC-based systems.
Advantages and Disadvantages
LC Film: Key Advantages & Limitations
Instant switching (milliseconds)
Full control, including segmented zones
Energy consumption, extremely low current.
Requires wiring and power
More complex integration (controllers, FPCs)
Photochromic Coating: Key Advantages & Limitations
Self-powered and maintenance-free
Smooth, natural tint transitions
Limited speed and responsiveness to light
Temperature dependency, slower darkening in winter, partial light blocking in heat
Fixed reaction, no manual override
Application Suitability
Best Fit: LC Film Applications
Sports Sunglasses: instant and automatic tint.
AR glasses & visors: rapid zone control and contrast optimization.
Stroboscopic training eyewear: segmented flashing for sensorimotor training.
Automotive sun visors: fast and automatic dimming not related to UV exposure.
Medical Applications: Pre determined sequences can be applied.
3D Shapes limited to one axis curvature
Best Fit: Photochromic Coating Applications
Outdoor eyeglasses/sunglasses: smooth tint without external control.
Casual eyewear: convenience and UV protection.
3D Shapes can be coated on unlimited curvatures.
Low-speed tinting contexts: good for leisure or non-critical environments.
Comparative Cost Analysis
Cost Structure of LC Film
Higher upfront costs: Non. Recuring Engineering (NRE) components, wiring, controllers.
Power systems and controllers add complexity.
Scalable at volume; unit cost decreases with production scale.
Cost Structure of Photochromic Coating
Lower initial cost per unit, just material and coating.
No power or electronics.
Batch-dependent costs coated lenses with optical and scratch resistance can be pricey.
Future Outlook
Roadmap for LC Film Technology
Integration with sensors and smart systems (IoT, ambient light).
Cost reduction via advanced materials and production efficiency.
Segmented and flexible designs for customized eyewear and visors.
Lower voltage, thinner architectures, and improved lifetime.
Roadmap for Photochromic Coating
Faster reaction via new molecules and polymer carriers
Stability against high temperature for consistent tint.
Hybrid lenses combining photochromic and coatings (e.g., polarization, blue-light filters).
Summary
Adaptive tinting offers game-changing capabilities in eyewear, architecture, and automotive design. LC dimming film provides fast, controllable, and segmented optical switching with electrical input, ideal for office privacy, AR applications, and training eyewear. Photochromic coatings offer effortless, battery-free light adaptation, perfect for everyday outdoor eyewear. The choice depends on response speed, power availability, and application needs. LC film offers rapid, programmable tinting at a higher cost, while photochromic coatings are cost-effective but slower. Future advancements are enabling both technologies to converge, promising smarter, more responsive, and durable tinting solutions for various markets.
FAQ
Which technology switches faster, LC film or photochromic coating?
LC film switches in milliseconds, while photochromic coatings typically take seconds to minutes.
Do photochromic lenses block UV light?
Yes, they provide full UVA and UVB protection even in the clear state.
Can LC film operate without electricity?
No, LC film needs low-voltage power to switch, and requires very low power to stay in tinted state.
Do photochromic lenses perform differently in cold weather?
Yes, cold accelerates darkening but slows clearing; hot temperatures lighten lenses faster.
Can LC film be cut for custom shapes?
No, LC films are predetermined and cannot be cut or segmented for bespoke eyewear after it produced, the LC is liquid and when cutting the LC cell the LC will leak.
What is the lifespan of LC film?
It typically withstands well over 1 million switch cycles and years of reliable service.
Are photochromic coatings scratch-resistant?
Often yes they’re combined with anti-scratch layers, but coatings can wear over time.
Can LC film be combined with sensors?
Definitely, LC films integrate easily with light, motion, rechargeable batteries or IoT sensors for smart control.
Which is more expensive?
LC film has higher upfront costs due to electronics; photochromic coatings are cheaper but may need replacement more often.
Q: Which is better for AR applications?
LC film is superior due to its fast, controllable switch and segmentation capabilities.




Comments